vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED) and Offerpad Solutions Inc. (OPAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $114.1M, roughly 1.2× Offerpad Solutions Inc.). On growth, UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-14.5% vs -34.5%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\'s revenue compounded faster (-5.3% CAGR vs -36.8%).
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
Offerpad Solutions Inc is a prominent U.S. proptech firm focused on simplifying residential real estate transactions. Operating under the iBuyer model, it purchases homes directly from sellers, conducts required renovations, and resells properties to buyers. It also provides supporting services including mortgage assistance, title services, and flexible moving options for clients across dozens of U.S. states.
OLED vs OPAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.2M | $114.1M |
| Net Profit | $35.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 25.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -14.5% | -34.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | 49.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.76 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $142.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.9M | $114.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.6M | $132.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.8M | $160.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.3M | $160.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.3M | $174.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.5M | $251.1M |
| Q1 26 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $-13.8M |
| Q1 26 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.8% | 8.7% |
| Q1 26 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | -3.9% |
| Q1 26 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | -9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.4% | -9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | -5.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.35 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $516.4M | $26.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $154.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $516.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $602.4M | $26.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.3M | $30.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.7M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.6M | $48.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.5M | $56.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $34.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $64.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $77.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $154.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $223.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $268.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $313.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $338.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $406.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $108.9M | $66.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $65.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 57.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.2M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.7M | $20.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.0M | $-54.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $65.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | $-13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.2M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.9M | $-54.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | -21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
OPAD
Segment breakdown not available.
