vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.0× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -31.4%, a 56.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
OLED vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.2M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $35.9M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 25.2% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.5% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.76 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $142.2M | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.9M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.6M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.8M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.3M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.3M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.5M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | $35.9M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.3M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 25.2% | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.4% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.76 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.40 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.35 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $516.4M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $516.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $602.4M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.7M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.6M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.5M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $108.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.2M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.7M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.0M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
