vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trip.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($304.6M vs $172.9M, roughly 1.8× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 38.4% vs 27.8%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
OLED vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.9M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $66.3M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 38.9% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 38.4% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.40 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.9M | $304.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.5M | $242.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 76.1% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.8% | 81.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 77.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.40 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $602.4M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $602.4M | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.5M | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $539.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $18.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $34.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $154.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLED
| Material Sales | $95.5M | 55% |
| Other | $72.6M | 42% |
| Contract Research Services | $4.8M | 3% |
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
