vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ohmyhome Ltd (OMH) and TON Strategy Co (TONX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TON Strategy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7M vs $5.2M, roughly 1.1× Ohmyhome Ltd). Ohmyhome Ltd runs the higher net margin — -32.6% vs -3968.6%, a 3936.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TON Strategy Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (694.2% vs 58.1%). Ohmyhome Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-599.2K vs $-8.0M).
Ohmyhome Ltd is a leading Southeast Asian proptech firm offering end-to-end residential property services including home sales, rentals, mortgage advisory, and conveyancing solutions. Operating primarily in Singapore and Malaysia, it connects property owners, prospective buyers, tenants, and licensed agents to streamline real estate transactions for all user groups.
OMH vs TONX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2M | $5.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-227.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -159.2% |
| Net Margin | -32.6% | -3968.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.1% | 694.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1.1% | -7047.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-3.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $723.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-227.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-6.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.4% | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 65.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -159.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -601.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | -138.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -203.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -513.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -200.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3968.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2336.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.6% | -111.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -196.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -440.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 315.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -265.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $-1.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-2.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $39.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $379.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.7M | $406.5M |
| Total Assets | $9.6M | $411.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.06× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $607.6K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $406.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $639.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $23.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $411.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $661.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $40.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-496.2K | $-8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-599.2K | $-8.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.5% | -139.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-496.2K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-599.2K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -139.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -261.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | -107.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -87.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -279.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.8% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OMH
Segment breakdown not available.
TONX
| Market Live | $4.8M | 83% |
| Other | $960.0K | 17% |
