vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ralph Lauren Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.6× ON Semiconductor). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 15.0%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ralph Lauren Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs -10.0%). Ralph Lauren Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($704.0M vs $372.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Ralph Lauren Corporation's revenue compounded faster (23.9% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
Ralph Lauren is an American fashion designer, philanthropist, and billionaire businessman, best known for founding the brand Ralph Lauren, a global multibillion-dollar enterprise. He stepped down as CEO of the company in September 2015 but remains executive chairman and chief creative officer. As of May 2025, his net worth is estimated at US$11.9 billion.
ON vs RL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $361.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 19.6% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 15.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | 21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $5.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $361.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $207.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $220.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $129.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $147.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $168.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | $90.7M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | 69.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 68.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 72.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 67.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | 6.9% |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $5.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $3.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $3.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $4.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $2.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $2.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $1.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $7.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $779.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | $704.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | 29.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | 2.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | $694.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $779.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $53.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $176.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $122.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $738.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $277.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | $704.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | $-40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | $677.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $243.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | 2.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
RL
Segment breakdown not available.
