vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $786.9M, roughly 2.0× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 16.4%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RANGE RESOURCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
ON vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
