vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $14.2M, roughly 109.3× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 16.4%, a 21.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SuperCom Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -10.0%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($372.4M vs $-3.6M).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
ON vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $562.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 46.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 30.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 37.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 27.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.28 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $13.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.43× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $611.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $257.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | -25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 12.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 17.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
