vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Onfolio Holdings, Inc (ONFO) and Peraso Inc. (PRSO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Peraso Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9M vs $2.0M, roughly 1.4× Onfolio Holdings, Inc). Onfolio Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -27.0% vs -43.3%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Onfolio Holdings, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-20.1% vs -22.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Onfolio Holdings, Inc's revenue compounded faster (13.0% CAGR vs 1.0%).
Onfolio Holdings Inc. acquires, manages and grows a diversified portfolio of small to medium-sized online businesses, including niche content sites, e-commerce stores, and SaaS tools. It operates primarily in North America and Western Europe, focusing on high-margin, sustainable digital assets with stable revenue streams.
Peraso Inc. is a semiconductor technology firm specializing in the design and production of high-performance millimeter wave (mmWave) integrated circuits and modules. It delivers 5G and next-generation wireless connectivity solutions for telecom infrastructure, industrial IoT, fixed wireless access and consumer electronics segments, serving customers across North America, Asia Pacific and European markets.
ONFO vs PRSO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | $-547.1K | $-1.2M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | -59.1% | -44.6% |
| Net Margin | -27.0% | -43.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.1% | -22.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -69.0% | 20.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-547.1K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-700.7K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-534.4K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-806.4K | $-471.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-323.8K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-335.6K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-629.0K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-477.8K | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 50.0% | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.6% | 56.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.6% | 48.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.7% | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.9% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.5% | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.3% | 46.4% |
| Q4 25 | -59.1% | -44.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | -36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.1% | -80.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.9% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.9% | -44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.1% | -105.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.7% | -128.9% |
| Q4 25 | -27.0% | -43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.6% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.0% | -82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.8% | -42.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | -70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.4% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | -72.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.36 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-1.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | $-1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $11.4M | $6.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $529.8K | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $11.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-397.3K | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-397.3K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-430.1K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-145.0K | $-966.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-471.6K | $-687.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0K | $-683.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-332.7K | $-659.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-431.0K | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ONFO
| B Two B | $1.6M | 81% |
| B Two C | $243.0K | 12% |
| Other | $138.6K | 7% |
PRSO
| Products | $2.8M | 96% |
| Other | $105.0K | 4% |
