vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ONITY GROUP INC. (ONIT) and TaskUs, Inc. (TASK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TaskUs, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($313.0M vs $290.0M, roughly 1.1× ONITY GROUP INC.). ONITY GROUP INC. runs the higher net margin — 43.9% vs 9.5%, a 34.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONITY GROUP INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.0% vs 14.1%). TaskUs, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.9M vs $-750.9M). Over the past eight quarters, TaskUs, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 10.1%).

Onity Group, formerly Ocwen, is a provider of residential and commercial mortgage loan servicing, special servicing, and asset management services, which has been described as "debt collectors, collecting monthly principal and interest from homeowners". Ocwen was founded in 1988 and is headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida, with additional offices in Mount Laurel, NJ, Rancho Cordova, California, and St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. It also has support operations in the Philippines and Indi...

Computer Task Group, Inc. is an American multinational company headquartered in Buffalo, New York, that provides information technology staffing. December 2023, it was announced that Cegeka concluded the purchase of the majority stake (74%) in CTG.

ONIT vs TASK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TASK
TASK
1.1× larger
TASK
$313.0M
$290.0M
ONIT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ONIT
ONIT
+14.9% gap
ONIT
29.0%
14.1%
TASK
Higher net margin
ONIT
ONIT
34.4% more per $
ONIT
43.9%
9.5%
TASK
More free cash flow
TASK
TASK
$760.8M more FCF
TASK
$9.9M
$-750.9M
ONIT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TASK
TASK
Annualised
TASK
17.3%
10.1%
ONIT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Revenue
$290.0M
$313.0M
Net Profit
$127.2M
$29.7M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
12.2%
Net Margin
43.9%
9.5%
Revenue YoY
29.0%
14.1%
Net Profit YoY
552.7%
235.3%
EPS (diluted)
$14.53
$0.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$290.0M
$313.0M
Q3 25
$280.3M
$298.7M
Q2 25
$246.6M
$294.1M
Q1 25
$249.8M
$277.8M
Q4 24
$224.8M
$274.2M
Q3 24
$265.7M
$255.3M
Q2 24
$246.4M
$237.9M
Q1 24
$239.1M
$227.5M
Net Profit
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$127.2M
$29.7M
Q3 25
$18.7M
$31.4M
Q2 25
$21.5M
$20.0M
Q1 25
$22.1M
$21.1M
Q4 24
$-28.1M
$8.9M
Q3 24
$21.4M
$12.7M
Q2 24
$10.5M
$12.6M
Q1 24
$30.1M
$11.7M
Operating Margin
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
12.2%
Q3 25
12.7%
Q2 25
10.3%
Q1 25
3.6%
12.3%
Q4 24
-14.9%
8.0%
Q3 24
10.4%
9.5%
Q2 24
5.5%
9.5%
Q1 24
13.3%
10.4%
Net Margin
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
43.9%
9.5%
Q3 25
6.7%
10.5%
Q2 25
8.7%
6.8%
Q1 25
8.8%
7.6%
Q4 24
-12.5%
3.2%
Q3 24
8.1%
5.0%
Q2 24
4.3%
5.3%
Q1 24
12.6%
5.1%
EPS (diluted)
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$14.53
$0.31
Q3 25
$2.03
$0.34
Q2 25
$2.40
$0.22
Q1 25
$2.50
$0.23
Q4 24
$-3.59
$0.09
Q3 24
$2.65
$0.14
Q2 24
$1.33
$0.14
Q1 24
$3.74
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$180.5M
$211.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$241.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$627.9M
$600.0M
Total Assets
$16.2B
$1.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.40×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$180.5M
$211.7M
Q3 25
$172.8M
$210.0M
Q2 25
$194.3M
$181.9M
Q1 25
$178.0M
$196.9M
Q4 24
$184.8M
$192.2M
Q3 24
$201.6M
$180.4M
Q2 24
$203.1M
$171.1M
Q1 24
$185.1M
$165.3M
Total Debt
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$241.4M
Q3 25
$246.3M
Q2 25
$249.6M
Q1 25
$252.9M
Q4 24
$256.2M
Q3 24
$259.4M
Q2 24
$261.0M
Q1 24
$262.6M
Stockholders' Equity
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$627.9M
$600.0M
Q3 25
$501.4M
$567.5M
Q2 25
$481.9M
$544.5M
Q1 25
$460.2M
$520.3M
Q4 24
$442.9M
$496.9M
Q3 24
$468.2M
$489.8M
Q2 24
$446.2M
$460.2M
Q1 24
$432.1M
$454.6M
Total Assets
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$16.2B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$16.1B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$16.5B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$16.3B
$985.5M
Q4 24
$16.4B
$953.3M
Q3 24
$13.2B
$942.1M
Q2 24
$13.1B
$886.1M
Q1 24
$13.1B
$874.5M
Debt / Equity
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
0.40×
Q3 25
0.43×
Q2 25
0.46×
Q1 25
0.49×
Q4 24
0.52×
Q3 24
0.53×
Q2 24
0.57×
Q1 24
0.58×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-748.0M
$29.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-750.9M
$9.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-258.9%
3.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.0%
6.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-5.88×
1.00×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$73.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$-748.0M
$29.7M
Q3 25
$229.5M
$54.3M
Q2 25
$-598.8M
$17.0M
Q1 25
$-148.1M
$36.3M
Q4 24
$-573.8M
$40.7M
Q3 24
$19.2M
$17.0M
Q2 24
$-77.9M
$30.0M
Q1 24
$-297.1M
$51.2M
Free Cash Flow
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
$-750.9M
$9.9M
Q3 25
$228.8M
$42.0M
Q2 25
$38.0K
Q1 25
$-148.4M
$21.8M
Q4 24
$-574.6M
$20.4M
Q3 24
$19.1M
$6.3M
Q2 24
$-78.0M
$25.5M
Q1 24
$-297.2M
$47.6M
FCF Margin
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
-258.9%
3.2%
Q3 25
81.6%
14.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
-59.4%
7.8%
Q4 24
-255.6%
7.4%
Q3 24
7.2%
2.5%
Q2 24
-31.7%
10.7%
Q1 24
-124.3%
20.9%
Capex Intensity
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
1.0%
6.3%
Q3 25
0.2%
4.1%
Q2 25
0.0%
5.8%
Q1 25
0.1%
5.2%
Q4 24
0.4%
7.4%
Q3 24
0.0%
4.2%
Q2 24
0.0%
1.9%
Q1 24
0.0%
1.6%
Cash Conversion
ONIT
ONIT
TASK
TASK
Q4 25
-5.88×
1.00×
Q3 25
12.27×
1.73×
Q2 25
-27.85×
0.85×
Q1 25
-6.70×
1.72×
Q4 24
4.59×
Q3 24
0.90×
1.34×
Q2 24
-7.42×
2.38×
Q1 24
-9.87×
4.37×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ONIT
ONIT

Segment breakdown not available.

TASK
TASK

Digital Customer Experience$172.7M55%
Trust And Safety$82.7M26%
AI Services$57.5M18%

Related Comparisons