vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $218.2M, roughly 1.1× ONTO INNOVATION INC.). ONTO INNOVATION INC. runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs -59.8%, a 72.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -13.5%). ONTO INNOVATION INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($82.0M vs $-108.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ONTO INNOVATION INC.'s revenue compounded faster (2.6% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
ONTO vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $218.2M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $28.2M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | 50.7% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.5% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.8% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $218.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $235.9M |
| Q3 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-141.1M |
| Q3 25 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 12.3% |
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -11.5% |
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -59.8% |
| Q3 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-80.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $603.1M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $603.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $190.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $135.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $454.2M |
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $127.7M |
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.5B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.4M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $82.0M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $261.3M | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $83.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-108.1M |
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-108.8M |
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -46.1% |
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.3% |
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
