vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OP Bancorp (OPBK) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OP Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.3M vs $13.4M, roughly 1.8× Outdoor Holding Co). On growth, OP Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -54.1%). OP Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.4M vs $5.0M).
OP Bancorp is the bank holding company for Open Bank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in California, United States. It provides a full range of banking solutions including deposit accounts, commercial real estate loans, small business financing, and consumer lending products, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises, local immigrant communities, and retail clients across Southern California.
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
OPBK vs POWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.3M | $13.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | -54.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 108.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $-50.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $-77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 85.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.7% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | -213.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.2% | -163.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.5% | -50.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | -50.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | -614.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | -120.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.7% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.45 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.37 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.36 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.3M | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $227.9M | $237.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $271.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.7M | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.4M | $63.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.9M | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.8M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.7M | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.2M | $55.6M |
| Q4 25 | $227.9M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.5M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.7M | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.1M | $222.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.0M | $299.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.6M | $325.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.9M | $342.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.7M | $358.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $271.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $269.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $297.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $355.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $398.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $403.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.2M | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.4M | $5.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 96.2% | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | $-2.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $-547.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $23.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $720.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 96.2% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 95.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.5% | -63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 139.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.5% | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.57× | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.90× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
