vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OP Bancorp (OPBK) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $24.3M, roughly 1.6× OP Bancorp). On growth, OP Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 1.1%). OP Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.4M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs 11.4%).
OP Bancorp is the bank holding company for Open Bank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in California, United States. It provides a full range of banking solutions including deposit accounts, commercial real estate loans, small business financing, and consumer lending products, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises, local immigrant communities, and retail clients across Southern California.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
OPBK vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $24.3M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.48 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $24.3M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.7% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.5% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.1% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.7% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.45 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.37 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.36 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.3M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $227.9M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.7M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.4M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.9M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.9M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.8M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.7M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.2M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $227.9M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.5M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.7M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.1M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.0M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.6M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.9M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.7M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.2M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.4M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 96.2% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $23.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 96.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 95.6% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 139.0% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.0% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.57× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.10× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.02× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.45× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.90× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.60× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OPBK
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
