vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU) and HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. (THG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Optimum Communications, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.3× HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.). HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs -3.3%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.1% vs -2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -1.5%).

Optimum Communications, Inc. is an American telecommunications provider owned by Franco-Israeli businessman Patrick Drahi. The company primarily provides digital cable television and broadband services in the New York metropolitan area as well as in several Midwestern and Southern U.S. states. With approximately 4.9 million residential and business customers in 21 U.S. states as of 2017 it is the fourth-largest telecommunications company in the United States. Optimum is based at One Court Squ...

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. is an insurance company based in Worcester, Massachusetts. It was the original name of a property-liability insurance firm established in 1852, and it remained a publicly traded company under that name until the early 1990s, when it changed its name to Allmerica Property & Casualty Companies.

OPTU vs THG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OPTU
OPTU
1.3× larger
OPTU
$2.2B
$1.7B
THG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
THG
THG
+8.5% gap
THG
6.1%
-2.3%
OPTU
Higher net margin
THG
THG
14.2% more per $
THG
11.0%
-3.3%
OPTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
THG
THG
Annualised
THG
5.2%
-1.5%
OPTU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Revenue
$2.2B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$-71.2M
$186.8M
Gross Margin
69.5%
Operating Margin
18.2%
11.1%
Net Margin
-3.3%
11.0%
Revenue YoY
-2.3%
6.1%
Net Profit YoY
-31.6%
45.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.16

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$2.1B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$2.2B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$2.2B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$1.5B
Net Profit
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
$186.8M
Q4 25
$-71.2M
$198.5M
Q3 25
$-1.6B
$178.7M
Q2 25
$-96.3M
$157.1M
Q1 25
$-75.7M
$128.2M
Q4 24
$-54.1M
$167.9M
Q3 24
$-43.0M
$102.1M
Q2 24
$15.4M
$40.5M
Gross Margin
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
69.5%
Q3 25
69.7%
Q2 25
69.1%
Q1 25
68.8%
Q4 24
67.7%
Q3 24
68.1%
Q2 24
67.9%
Operating Margin
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
11.1%
Q4 25
18.2%
17.3%
Q3 25
-55.3%
14.9%
Q2 25
14.5%
12.7%
Q1 25
16.0%
11.6%
Q4 24
15.2%
16.1%
Q3 24
20.0%
9.6%
Q2 24
22.4%
6.2%
Net Margin
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
11.0%
Q4 25
-3.3%
11.9%
Q3 25
-77.1%
10.7%
Q2 25
-4.5%
9.5%
Q1 25
-3.5%
8.0%
Q4 24
-2.4%
10.6%
Q3 24
-1.9%
6.5%
Q2 24
0.7%
2.6%
EPS (diluted)
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.16
$5.46
Q3 25
$-3.47
$4.90
Q2 25
$-0.21
$4.30
Q1 25
$-0.16
$3.50
Q4 24
$-0.11
$4.60
Q3 24
$-0.09
$2.80
Q2 24
$0.03
$1.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
$243.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$26.2B
$843.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-2.3B
$3.0B
Total Assets
$30.7B
$16.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.28×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
$243.5M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$938.8M
$915.7M
Q2 25
$247.3M
$244.1M
Q1 25
$279.1M
$315.1M
Q4 24
$256.5M
$435.5M
Q3 24
$250.0M
$427.1M
Q2 24
$362.1M
$337.6M
Total Debt
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
$843.8M
Q4 25
$26.2B
$843.3M
Q3 25
$26.2B
$843.0M
Q2 25
$25.3B
$347.8M
Q1 25
$25.3B
$722.5M
Q4 24
$25.1B
$722.3M
Q3 24
$25.1B
Q2 24
$25.2B
Stockholders' Equity
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
$3.0B
Q4 25
$-2.3B
$3.6B
Q3 25
$-2.2B
$3.4B
Q2 25
$-624.1M
$3.2B
Q1 25
$-543.0M
$3.0B
Q4 24
$-469.2M
$2.8B
Q3 24
$-427.1M
$2.9B
Q2 24
$-399.1M
$2.6B
Total Assets
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
$16.5B
Q4 25
$30.7B
$16.9B
Q3 25
$30.7B
$16.8B
Q2 25
$31.6B
$15.7B
Q1 25
$31.7B
$15.5B
Q4 24
$31.7B
$15.3B
Q3 24
$31.8B
$15.4B
Q2 24
$32.0B
$14.9B
Debt / Equity
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
0.28×
Q4 25
0.24×
Q3 25
0.25×
Q2 25
0.11×
Q1 25
0.24×
Q4 24
0.25×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$481.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$199.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
9.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-118.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$481.6M
$378.2M
Q3 25
$147.4M
$554.4M
Q2 25
$412.0M
$206.6M
Q1 25
$187.5M
$38.9M
Q4 24
$439.9M
$213.5M
Q3 24
$436.0M
$394.7M
Q2 24
$306.8M
$139.5M
Free Cash Flow
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$199.4M
$377.0M
Q3 25
$-178.1M
$551.4M
Q2 25
$28.4M
$204.9M
Q1 25
$-168.6M
$37.1M
Q4 24
$49.9M
$210.5M
Q3 24
$76.9M
$392.3M
Q2 24
$-40.9M
$137.3M
FCF Margin
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.1%
22.6%
Q3 25
-8.4%
33.1%
Q2 25
1.3%
12.4%
Q1 25
-7.8%
2.3%
Q4 24
2.2%
13.3%
Q3 24
3.5%
25.1%
Q2 24
-1.8%
8.9%
Capex Intensity
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
12.9%
0.1%
Q3 25
15.4%
0.2%
Q2 25
17.9%
0.1%
Q1 25
16.5%
0.1%
Q4 24
17.5%
0.2%
Q3 24
16.1%
0.2%
Q2 24
15.5%
0.1%
Cash Conversion
OPTU
OPTU
THG
THG
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.91×
Q3 25
3.10×
Q2 25
1.32×
Q1 25
0.30×
Q4 24
1.27×
Q3 24
3.87×
Q2 24
19.97×
3.44×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

OPTU
OPTU

Total Residential Revenue$1.6B74%
Business Servicesand Wholesale$401.8M18%
Telephony$60.8M3%
Other$57.9M3%
Franchise$50.0M2%

THG
THG

Premiums earned$1.6B92%
Other$124.6M7%
Fees and other income$6.2M0%

Related Comparisons