vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Optex Systems Holdings Inc (OPXS) and Valaris Ltd (VAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Optex Systems Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $5.2M, roughly 1.8× Valaris Ltd). Valaris Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13798.1% vs 2.6%, a 13795.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Valaris Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (405.9% vs 11.6%). Optex Systems Holdings Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-548.0K vs $-34.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Valaris Ltd's revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 3.6%).
Optex Systems Holdings Inc. designs, manufactures and supplies high-performance optical, optoelectronic components and integrated subsystems. Its core products include military sighting systems, laser protection solutions and precision optical assemblies, serving defense, aerospace and industrial manufacturing markets globally.
Valaris Limited is an offshore drilling contractor headquartered in Houston, Texas, and incorporated in Bermuda. It is the largest offshore drilling and well drilling company in the world. As of February 2025, it owned 52 rigs, including 36 offshore jackup rigs, 11 drillships, and 5 semi-submersible platform drilling rigs.
OPXS vs VAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.1M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | $242.0K | $717.5M |
| Gross Margin | 22.9% | -7850.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 2.6% | 13798.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 405.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.3% | 436.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $10.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $700.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $242.0K | $717.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $188.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $115.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.0K | $133.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $149.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $25.5M |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | -7850.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | -7142.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -56428.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | 24529.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | -11748.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | -9039.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.0% | -17007.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 13798.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 3358.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 16442.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | -7864.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 1656.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 3116.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | 980.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $10.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $2.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $1.61 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.12 | $1.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.18 | $2.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.16 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.8M | $599.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.7M | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $30.2M | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $599.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4M | $662.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $503.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $368.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $379.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $486.0K | $398.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.0K | $494.1M |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.8M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8M | $4.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-92.0K | $72.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-548.0K | $-34.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.0% | -655.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 2044.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.38× | 0.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $159.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-92.0K | $72.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $198.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | $124.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $753.0K | $193.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $26.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-548.0K | $-34.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $128.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $545.0K | $111.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-256.0K | $-98.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-125.0M |
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | -655.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 2291.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7542.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.3% | -758.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2848.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | -2056.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.3% | -4807.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 2044.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1246.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 9600.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | -6570.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 2100.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 2295.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 5819.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.38× | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | 2.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.04× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.20× | 1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OPXS
| Optex Systems OPX Richardson Texas | $5.3M | 58% |
| Applied Optics Center AOC Dallas | $4.0M | 44% |
VAL
Segment breakdown not available.
