vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of OR Royalties Inc. (OR) and RGC RESOURCES INC (RGCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

OR Royalties Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.7M vs $30.6M, roughly 1.5× RGC RESOURCES INC).

OR Royalties Inc. is a Canadian company that holds royalties in gold, silver and diamond mines, principally in the form of net smelter returns and streams.Like its predecessor company, Osisko Mining, it is headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, with shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.

Iluka Resources is an Australian resources company, specialising in mineral sands exploration, project development, operations and marketing. It was formed in July 1998 in a merger between Westralian Sands and the titanium mineral business RGC Ltd, becoming Iluka Resources Ltd in 1999. Iluka is a major producer of zircon and titanium dioxide–derived rutile and synthetic rutile globally. The company has operations in Australia, and has also conducted business in the United States and the West ...

OR vs RGCO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OR
OR
1.5× larger
OR
$46.7M
$30.6M
RGCO

Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Revenue
$46.7M
$30.6M
Net Profit
$4.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
21.4%
Net Margin
16.0%
Revenue YoY
13.9%
Net Profit YoY
-7.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$30.6M
Q3 25
$14.0M
Q2 25
$16.6M
Q1 25
$36.5M
Q4 24
$26.8M
Q3 24
$12.8M
Q2 24
$13.6M
Q1 24
$30.8M
Net Profit
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$4.9M
Q3 25
$-204.3K
Q2 25
$538.4K
Q1 25
$7.7M
Q4 24
$5.3M
Q3 24
$140.8K
Q2 24
$156.7K
Q1 24
$6.4M
Operating Margin
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
21.4%
Q3 25
-3.4%
Q2 25
7.2%
Q1 25
28.5%
Q4 24
27.3%
Q3 24
1.9%
Q2 24
11.5%
Q1 24
28.0%
Net Margin
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
16.0%
Q3 25
-1.5%
Q2 25
3.2%
Q1 25
21.1%
Q4 24
19.6%
Q3 24
1.1%
Q2 24
1.2%
Q1 24
20.9%
EPS (diluted)
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$0.47
Q3 25
$-0.01
Q2 25
$0.05
Q1 25
$0.74
Q4 24
$0.51
Q3 24
$0.01
Q2 24
$0.02
Q1 24
$0.63

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$222.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$116.4M
Total Assets
$341.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.17×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Stockholders' Equity
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$116.4M
Q3 25
$113.6M
Q2 25
$116.3M
Q1 25
$117.8M
Q4 24
$111.8M
Q3 24
$108.1M
Q2 24
$108.8M
Q1 24
$110.5M
Total Assets
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$341.0M
Q3 25
$329.8M
Q2 25
$324.8M
Q1 25
$326.4M
Q4 24
$335.2M
Q3 24
$320.7M
Q2 24
$314.2M
Q1 24
$313.4M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-4.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-14.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
18.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.22×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$1.1M
Q3 25
$675.1K
Q2 25
$6.4M
Q1 25
$21.0M
Q4 24
$827.2K
Q3 24
$377.4K
Q2 24
$5.9M
Q1 24
$11.8M
Free Cash Flow
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
$-4.6M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$1.4M
Q1 25
$16.1M
Q4 24
$-4.9M
Q3 24
$-5.1M
Q2 24
$564.7K
Q1 24
$5.8M
FCF Margin
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
-14.9%
Q3 25
Q2 25
8.4%
Q1 25
44.1%
Q4 24
-18.3%
Q3 24
-40.2%
Q2 24
4.2%
Q1 24
18.8%
Capex Intensity
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
18.5%
Q3 25
Q2 25
30.4%
Q1 25
13.6%
Q4 24
21.4%
Q3 24
43.2%
Q2 24
39.0%
Q1 24
19.4%
Cash Conversion
OR
OR
RGCO
RGCO
Q4 25
0.22×
Q3 25
Q2 25
11.96×
Q1 25
2.74×
Q4 24
0.16×
Q3 24
2.68×
Q2 24
37.36×
Q1 24
1.83×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons