vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ORA) and UMB FINANCIAL CORP (UMBF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UMB FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($739.2M vs $403.9M, roughly 1.8× ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). UMB FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 10.9%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (75.8% vs 31.1%). Over the past eight quarters, UMB FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (73.7% CAGR vs 37.7%).
Ormat Technologies, Inc. is an international company based in Reno, Nevada, United States. Ormat supplies alternative and renewable geothermal energy technology. The company has built over 190 power plants and installed over 3,200 MW of output. As of January 2021 it owns and operates 933 MW of geothermal and recovered energy based power plants. Ormat has supplied over 1000 turbochargers worldwide, in North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. The company's products also includ...
UMB Financial Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. It offers comprehensive financial services, including deposit solutions like checking and savings accounts, credit services including home mortgages, auto loans, business loans and credit cards, as well as investing and wealth management. UMB serves individuals, companies and institutions across the U.S. and in Ireland.
ORA vs UMBF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $403.9M | $739.2M |
| Net Profit | $44.1M | $261.4M |
| Gross Margin | 29.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 75.8% | 31.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.2% | 221.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $3.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $403.9M | $739.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $276.0M | $522.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.7M | $475.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.0M | $467.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.8M | $397.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.7M | $269.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.8M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.0M | $245.1M |
| Q1 26 | $44.1M | $261.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $215.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | $188.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | $217.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.4M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $109.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $101.3M |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 51.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 58.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.3% | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 54.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | 51.8% |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 46.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 44.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 41.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.71 | $3.35 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.51 | $2.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $2.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $2.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $2.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $2.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $2.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $477.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $7.8B |
| Total Assets | $6.8B | $72.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.06× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $654.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.4M | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.7M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.4M | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.1M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.3M | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $477.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $474.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $471.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $657.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $654.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $385.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $384.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $384.2M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | $6.8B | $72.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $73.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $71.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $71.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $69.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $50.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $47.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $44.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.97× | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ORA
| Electricity | $181.6M | 45% |
| Product | $177.4M | 44% |
| Energy storage | $44.9M | 11% |
UMBF
Segment breakdown not available.
