vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ORA) and VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. (VIAV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($406.8M vs $403.9M, roughly 1.0× ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs 1.6%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (75.8% vs 42.8%). Over the past eight quarters, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (37.7% CAGR vs 27.1%).
Ormat Technologies, Inc. is an international company based in Reno, Nevada, United States. Ormat supplies alternative and renewable geothermal energy technology. The company has built over 190 power plants and installed over 3,200 MW of output. As of January 2021 it owns and operates 933 MW of geothermal and recovered energy based power plants. Ormat has supplied over 1000 turbochargers worldwide, in North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. The company's products also includ...
Viavi Solutions Inc., formerly part of JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU), is an American network test, measurement and assurance technology company based in Chandler, Arizona. The company manufactures testing and monitoring equipment for networks. It also develops optical technology used for a range of applications including material quality control, currency anti-counterfeiting and 3D motion sensing, including Microsoft's Kinect video game controller.
ORA vs VIAV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $403.9M | $406.8M |
| Net Profit | $44.1M | $6.4M |
| Gross Margin | 29.8% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 75.8% | 42.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.2% | -76.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $403.9M | $406.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $276.0M | $369.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.7M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.0M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.8M | $284.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.7M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.8M | $238.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.0M | $252.0M |
| Q1 26 | $44.1M | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $-48.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.4M | $19.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $-21.7M |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 57.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | 56.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.3% | 56.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | 56.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.9% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | 57.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | -2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | -13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | -8.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.71 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.51 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.6M | $500.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $846.5M |
| Total Assets | $6.8B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $654.6M | $500.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.4M | $767.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $545.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | $425.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.7M | $396.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.4M | $509.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.1M | $493.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.3M | $491.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $640.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $396.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $639.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $637.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $636.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $846.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $834.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $723.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $780.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $728.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $682.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $702.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $681.6M |
| Q1 26 | $6.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.97× | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ORA
| Electricity | $181.6M | 45% |
| Product | $177.4M | 44% |
| Energy storage | $44.9M | 11% |
VIAV
Segment breakdown not available.
