vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eightco Holdings Inc. (ORBS) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Venus Concept Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.8M vs $10.2M, roughly 1.4× Eightco Holdings Inc.). Venus Concept Inc. runs the higher net margin — -163.8% vs -2281.6%, a 2117.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Venus Concept Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -49.9%). Venus Concept Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.9M vs $-11.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Eightco Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
ORBS vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.2M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-232.5M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | -13.0% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -475.0% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | -2281.6% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -49.9% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9183.3% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.34 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-232.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.8M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.2M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | -13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.1% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -475.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.9% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.9% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.1% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.6% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -2281.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -487.6% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.7% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.3% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.5% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.2% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.4% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.58 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.84 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.44 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.77 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.15 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.42 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.5M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $232.6M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $250.2M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $696.3K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $434.4K | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.2K | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.1K | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $808.8K | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $232.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $339.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $250.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.5M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.6M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.8M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.2M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.0M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.0M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -107.7% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-659.2K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $999.8K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-440.3K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-723.3K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-661.3K | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $999.7K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -107.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.7% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.1% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.7% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ORBS
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
