vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
O’Reilly Automotive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.6B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.2× Stanley Black & Decker). O’Reilly Automotive runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 1.4%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, O’Reilly Automotive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.2% vs 0.1%). O’Reilly Automotive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.8B vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, O’Reilly Automotive's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 0.3%).
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., doing business as O'Reilly Auto Parts, is an American automotive part retailer that provides automotive parts, tools, supplies, equipment, and accessories to professional service providers and do-it-yourself customers. Founded in 1957 by the O’Reilly family, O'Reilly Auto Parts operates more than 6,400 stores in 48 states, Puerto Rico, Mexico, and Canada.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
ORLY vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.6B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $604.2M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 51.5% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.2% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $604.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $605.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.9M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $668.6M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $538.5M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.1M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.5M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $622.8M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | 51.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.9% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.4% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.3% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.7% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.35 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.50 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.41 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.55 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $252.6M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $16.9B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $252.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.5M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.6M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $191.2M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.2M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.0M | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-763.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-894.7M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $16.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.1B | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.8B | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.5% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.15× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.9B | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $633.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $616.5M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $756.8M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $755.1M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.5M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $772.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $948.9M | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $364.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.4M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $456.1M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $468.2M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.0M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $513.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $723.5M | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 5.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.13× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ORLY
| Sales to professional service provider customers | $2.3B | 50% |
| Sales to do-it-yourself customers | $2.2B | 48% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
