vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OSHKOSH CORP (OSK) and SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO (SMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OSHKOSH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.6× SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO). SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs 1.9%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OSHKOSH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -16.9%). Over the past eight quarters, SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -9.8%).
OSHKOSH CORPOSKEarnings & Financial Report
Oshkosh Corporation, formerly Oshkosh Truck, is an American industrial company that designs and builds specialty trucks, military vehicles, truck bodies, airport fire apparatus, and access equipment. The corporation also owns Pierce Manufacturing, a fire apparatus manufacturer in Appleton, Wisconsin, and JLG Industries, a manufacturer of lift equipment, including aerial lifts, boom lifts, scissor lifts, telehandlers and low-level access lifts.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Marysville, Ohio, where O.M. Scott began selling lawn seed in 1868. The company manufactures and sells consumer lawn, garden and pest control products, as well as soilless indoor gardening equipment. In the U.S., the company manufactures Scotts, Miracle-Gro and Ortho brands. It also markets and distributes the herbicide Roundup in the U.S. and several international markets including China.
OSK vs SMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $43.1M | $238.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 27.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -16.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.6% | 61.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $-2.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $354.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $387.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $416.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $414.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $43.1M | $238.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $133.8M | $-125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.8M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.2M | $217.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.1M | $-69.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $168.6M | $132.1M |
| Q1 26 | 13.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | -12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -52.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.68 | $-2.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $250.3M | $6.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $600.6M | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $10.0B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $250.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $479.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.8M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.3M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.9M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.9M | $71.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.4M | $279.9M |
| Q1 26 | $600.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $602.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $599.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $-500.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $-357.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $-170.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $-290.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $-479.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $-390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $-146.2M |
| Q1 26 | $10.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
