vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OSHKOSH CORP (OSK) and Targa Resources (TRGP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Targa Resources is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.8× OSHKOSH CORP). Targa Resources runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs 1.9%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OSHKOSH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -10.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Targa Resources's revenue compounded faster (15.9% CAGR vs -9.8%).
OSHKOSH CORPOSKEarnings & Financial Report
Oshkosh Corporation, formerly Oshkosh Truck, is an American industrial company that designs and builds specialty trucks, military vehicles, truck bodies, airport fire apparatus, and access equipment. The corporation also owns Pierce Manufacturing, a fire apparatus manufacturer in Appleton, Wisconsin, and JLG Industries, a manufacturer of lift equipment, including aerial lifts, boom lifts, scissor lifts, telehandlers and low-level access lifts.
Targa Resources Corp. is a Fortune 500 company based in Houston, Texas. Targa, a midstream energy infrastructure corporation, is one of the largest infrastructure companies delivering natural gas and natural gas liquids in the United States. Their operations are based largely, though not entirely, on the Gulf Coast, particularly in Texas and Louisiana. Matthew J. Meloy has been Chief Executive Officer since 2020.
OSK vs TRGP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $4.1B |
| Net Profit | $43.1M | $487.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -10.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.6% | 74.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $43.1M | $487.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $133.8M | $545.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.2M | $478.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.8M | $629.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.2M | $270.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.1M | $350.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.3M | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $168.6M | $298.5M |
| Q1 26 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 20.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $250.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $600.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $10.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $250.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $479.8M | $166.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.8M | $124.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.7M | $113.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.9M | $157.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.9M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.4M | $166.4M |
| Q1 26 | $600.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $602.3M | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $599.1M | $13.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $25.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $24.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $23.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8B | $22.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $21.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $21.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | 5.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 5.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OSK
Segment breakdown not available.
TRGP
| Sales of commodities | $3.3B | 82% |
| Fees from midstream services | $750.1M | 18% |
