How do OSHKOSH CORP and Yum! Brands compare by revenue?

OSHKOSH CORP reported revenue of $2.7B in Q4 FY2025, while Yum! Brands reported $2.5B in Q4 FY2025. OSHKOSH CORP is 1.1× larger by last-quarter revenue.

Which is growing revenue faster, OSHKOSH CORP or Yum! Brands?

OSHKOSH CORP's latest revenue grew 3.5% year-over-year, versus 6.5% for Yum! Brands. Yum! Brands is growing faster on a YoY basis.

Which has a higher gross margin, OSHKOSH CORP or Yum! Brands?

OSHKOSH CORP's gross margin is 15.8% vs Yum! Brands's 67.6%. Yum! Brands converts more of each revenue dollar into gross profit.

Which has a higher net margin, OSHKOSH CORP or Yum! Brands?

OSHKOSH CORP's net margin is 5.0% vs Yum! Brands's 21.3%. Yum! Brands has the higher bottom-line margin.

Which generates more free cash flow, OSHKOSH CORP or Yum! Brands?

OSHKOSH CORP generated $540.3M of free cash flow last quarter, versus $482.0M for Yum! Brands. Free cash flow is operating cash flow minus capital expenditure — what's actually left for dividends, buybacks and debt repayment.

What is the 2-year revenue CAGR for OSHKOSH CORP vs Yum! Brands?

Over the trailing 8 quarters, OSHKOSH CORP compounded revenue at roughly 2.8% per year, versus 25.5% for Yum! Brands. Yum! Brands has the faster medium-term growth trajectory.

Where does this OSK vs YUM data come from?

All figures are parsed directly from SEC EDGAR 10-Q / 10-K / 20-F / 6-K filings (for US-listed issuers) or EDINET filings (for Japanese issuers), then normalised into a common schema. Numbers update automatically as new filings are released.

vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of OSHKOSH CORP (OSK) and Yum! Brands (YUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

OSHKOSH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.1× Yum! Brands). Yum! Brands runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 5.0%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Yum! Brands posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 3.5%). OSHKOSH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($540.3M vs $482.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Yum! Brands's revenue compounded faster (25.5% CAGR vs 2.8%).

OSHKOSH CORPOSKEarnings & Financial Report

NYSE · Industrials · Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies

Oshkosh Corporation, formerly Oshkosh Truck, is an American industrial company that designs and builds specialty trucks, military vehicles, truck bodies, airport fire apparatus, and access equipment. The corporation also owns Pierce Manufacturing, a fire apparatus manufacturer in Appleton, Wisconsin, and JLG Industries, a manufacturer of lift equipment, including aerial lifts, boom lifts, scissor lifts, telehandlers and low-level access lifts.

Yum! BrandsYUMEarnings & Financial Report

NYSE · Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.

OSK vs YUM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue

OSK

1.1× larger

$2.7B

$2.5B

Growing faster (revenue YoY)

YUM

+3.0% gap

6.5%

3.5%

Higher net margin

YUM

16.3% more per $

21.3%

5.0%

More free cash flow

OSK

$58.3M more FCF

$540.3M

$482.0M

Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR

YUM

Annualised

25.5%

2.8%

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric	OSK	YUM
Revenue	$2.7B	$2.5B
Net Profit	$133.8M	$535.0M
Gross Margin	15.8%	67.6%
Operating Margin	7.9%	29.3%
Net Margin	5.0%	21.3%
Revenue YoY	3.5%	6.5%
Net Profit YoY	-12.6%	26.5%
EPS (diluted)	—	$1.91

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$2.7B	$2.5B
Q3 25	$2.7B	$2.0B
Q2 25	$2.7B	$1.9B
Q1 25	$2.3B	$1.8B
Q4 24	$2.6B	$2.4B
Q3 24	$2.7B	$1.8B
Q2 24	$2.8B	$1.8B
Q1 24	$2.5B	$1.6B

Net Profit

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$133.8M	$535.0M
Q3 25	$196.2M	$397.0M
Q2 25	$204.8M	$374.0M
Q1 25	$112.2M	$253.0M
Q4 24	$153.1M	$423.0M
Q3 24	$180.3M	$382.0M
Q2 24	$168.6M	$367.0M
Q1 24	$179.4M	$314.0M

Gross Margin

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	15.8%	67.6%
Q3 25	17.5%	70.3%
Q2 25	19.2%	71.0%
Q1 25	17.3%	70.9%
Q4 24	17.2%	69.2%
Q3 24	18.5%	71.4%
Q2 24	19.2%	73.3%
Q1 24	18.5%	75.0%

Operating Margin

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	7.9%	29.3%
Q3 25	9.7%	33.7%
Q2 25	10.7%	32.2%
Q1 25	7.6%	30.7%
Q4 24	8.6%	27.8%
Q3 24	9.7%	33.9%
Q2 24	9.2%	34.4%
Q1 24	10.2%	32.5%

Net Margin

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	5.0%	21.3%
Q3 25	7.3%	20.1%
Q2 25	7.5%	19.3%
Q1 25	4.9%	14.2%
Q4 24	5.9%	17.9%
Q3 24	6.6%	20.9%
Q2 24	5.9%	20.8%
Q1 24	7.1%	19.6%

EPS (diluted)

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	—	$1.91
Q3 25	—	$1.41
Q2 25	—	$1.33
Q1 25	—	$0.90
Q4 24	—	$1.49
Q3 24	—	$1.35
Q2 24	—	$1.28
Q1 24	—	$1.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric	OSK	YUM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand	$479.8M	$709.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger	—	$11.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value	$4.5B	$-7.3B
Total Assets	$10.1B	$8.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage	—	—

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$479.8M	$709.0M
Q3 25	$211.8M	$1.0B
Q2 25	$191.7M	$677.0M
Q1 25	$210.3M	$607.0M
Q4 24	$204.9M	$707.0M
Q3 24	$160.9M	$548.0M
Q2 24	$141.4M	$520.0M
Q1 24	$69.9M	$652.0M

Total Debt

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	—	$11.9B
Q3 25	—	$11.5B
Q2 25	—	$10.4B
Q1 25	—	$11.3B
Q4 24	—	$11.3B
Q3 24	$602.3M	$11.2B
Q2 24	$599.1M	$11.1B
Q1 24	$598.9M	$11.1B

Stockholders' Equity

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$4.5B	$-7.3B
Q3 25	$4.5B	$-7.5B
Q2 25	$4.5B	$-7.7B
Q1 25	$4.2B	$-7.8B
Q4 24	$4.2B	$-7.6B
Q3 24	$4.1B	$-7.7B
Q2 24	$3.9B	$-7.6B
Q1 24	$3.8B	$-7.8B

Total Assets

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$10.1B	$8.2B
Q3 25	$9.8B	$7.2B
Q2 25	$10.0B	$6.9B
Q1 25	$9.8B	$6.7B
Q4 24	$9.4B	$6.7B
Q3 24	$9.9B	$6.5B
Q2 24	$9.7B	$6.4B
Q1 24	$9.5B	$6.2B

Debt / Equity

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	—	—
Q3 25	—	—
Q2 25	—	—
Q1 25	—	—
Q4 24	—	—
Q3 24	0.15×	—
Q2 24	0.15×	—
Q1 24	0.16×	—

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric	OSK	YUM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter	$600.1M	$617.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex	$540.3M	$482.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue	20.1%	19.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue	2.2%	5.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit	4.49×	1.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters	$618.0M	$1.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$600.1M	$617.0M
Q3 25	$489.0M	$543.0M
Q2 25	$89.2M	$446.0M
Q1 25	$-394.9M	$404.0M
Q4 24	$790.8M	$513.0M
Q3 24	$326.1M	$471.0M
Q2 24	$-211.0M	$342.0M
Q1 24	$-355.8M	$363.0M

Free Cash Flow

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	$540.3M	$482.0M
Q3 25	$464.3M	$449.0M
Q2 25	$48.6M	$375.0M
Q1 25	$-435.2M	$333.0M
Q4 24	$703.3M	$407.0M
Q3 24	$272.2M	$419.0M
Q2 24	$-250.5M	$292.0M
Q1 24	$-455.9M	$314.0M

FCF Margin

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	20.1%	19.2%
Q3 25	17.3%	22.7%
Q2 25	1.8%	19.4%
Q1 25	-18.8%	18.6%
Q4 24	27.1%	17.2%
Q3 24	9.9%	22.9%
Q2 24	-8.8%	16.6%
Q1 24	-17.9%	19.6%

Capex Intensity

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	2.2%	5.4%
Q3 25	0.9%	4.7%
Q2 25	1.5%	3.7%
Q1 25	1.7%	4.0%
Q4 24	3.4%	4.5%
Q3 24	2.0%	2.8%
Q2 24	1.4%	2.8%
Q1 24	3.9%	3.1%

Cash Conversion

OSK

YUM

Q4 25	4.49×	1.15×
Q3 25	2.49×	1.37×
Q2 25	0.44×	1.19×
Q1 25	-3.52×	1.60×
Q4 24	5.17×	1.21×
Q3 24	1.81×	1.23×
Q2 24	-1.25×	0.93×
Q1 24	-1.98×	1.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

OSK

Vocational Segment	$922.4M	34%
Aerial Works Platforms	$548.6M	20%
Other Access Equipment	$311.8M	12%
Telehandlers	$311.2M	12%
Airport Products	$252.7M	9%
Delivery Vehicles	$165.0M	6%
Other Vocational	$130.7M	5%
Transferred Over Time	$23.5M	1%