vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OPEN TEXT CORP (OTEX) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× OPEN TEXT CORP). OPEN TEXT CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.5% vs 12.8%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.6% vs 2.2%). OPEN TEXT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($305.0M vs $248.1M). Over the past eight quarters, OPEN TEXT CORP's revenue compounded faster (-3.0% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Open Text Corporation is a global software company that develops and sells information management software.
Williams Sonoma is an American retailer of cookware, appliances, and home furnishings. It is owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and was founded by Charles E. (Chuck) Williams in 1956.
OTEX vs WSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $172.7M | $241.6M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 13.5% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.70 | $1.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $172.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.1M | $241.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.6M | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.8M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $229.9M | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.4M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.2M | $265.7M |
| Q1 26 | 73.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.8% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 72.3% | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.3% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.7% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.5% | 48.3% |
| Q1 26 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.7% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.58 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.91 | $4.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $884.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $13.3B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $985.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $826.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2B | $5.2B |
| Q1 26 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $354.6M | $316.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $305.0M | $248.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 23.8% | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.05× | 1.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $809.6M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $354.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $318.7M | $316.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $282.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $158.2M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.2M | $633.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $348.0M | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-77.8M | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.2M | $226.8M |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $279.4M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.2M | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.8M | $566.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.7M | $170.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-117.1M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.2M | $187.3M |
| Q1 26 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.8% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.90× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.49× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.33× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.51× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.92× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OTEX
| Customer support | $564.8M | 44% |
| Cloud services and subscriptions | $492.9M | 38% |
| License | $145.1M | 11% |
| Professional service and other | $79.6M | 6% |
WSM
Segment breakdown not available.
