vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and PVH CORP. /DE/ (PVH), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PVH CORP. /DE/ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $307.3M, roughly 7.5× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). PVH CORP. /DE/ runs the higher net margin — -20.7% vs 0.2%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PVH CORP. /DE/ posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -0.2%). OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-47.9M vs $-85.1M).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
PVH Corp., formerly known as the Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, is an American clothing company which owns brands such as Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein. The company also licenses brands such as Kenneth Cole New York and Michael Kors.
OXM vs PVH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $2.3B |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $4.2M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 56.3% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | 7.9% |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | 57.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 58.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $4.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | $-0.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.72 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $158.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $4.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $11.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $248.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $191.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $11.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | $-44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | $-85.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | -3.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 12.6% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -10.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | $213.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-71.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | $-85.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $-98.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
PVH
| Sales Channel Salesto Wholesale Customers | $1.0B | 44% |
| Sales Channel Sales To Owned And Operated Retail Customers | $868.0M | 38% |
| Sales Channel Sales To Owned And Operated Digital Retail Customers | $186.6M | 8% |
| Licensing | $99.5M | 4% |
| Other | $75.8M | 3% |
| Heritage Brands | $51.3M | 2% |
