vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Occidental Petroleum (OXY) and ReNew Energy Global plc (RNW), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Occidental Petroleum is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $17.0K, roughly 97586.8× ReNew Energy Global plc). Occidental Petroleum produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.9B vs $-23.6K).
Occidental Petroleum Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the United States and the Middle East as well as petrochemical manufacturing in the United States, Canada, and Chile. It is incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law and headquartered in Houston. The company ranked 183rd on the 2021 Fortune 500 based on its 2020 revenues and 670th on the 2021 Forbes Global 2000.
ReNew Energy Global plc is an Indian renewable energy company, based in Gurgaon. It is the first Indian renewable energy company to be listed on NASDAQ. ReNew operates more than 150 projects spread across ten states in India.
OXY vs RNW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $17.0K |
| Net Profit | $114.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -75.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 195.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $114.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $842.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $468.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $945.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-120.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $888.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 88.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 89.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $20.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $36.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $84.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $84.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.60× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.6B | $4.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.9B | $-23.6K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 113.4% | -139.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 45.4% | 164.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 23.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $962.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $623.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $224.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 113.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
