vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) and PAMT CORP (PAMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAMT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.3M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.5× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -12.0%).
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
PACK vs PAMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.7M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-29.3M |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | -27.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-1.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.8M | $151.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $155.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.6M | $166.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.6M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $182.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.5M | $182.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.4M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.1M | $281.0K |
| Q4 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.6% | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.2% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.0M | $83.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $401.9M | $333.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.9M | $210.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $697.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | 1.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.5M | $102.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.1M | $110.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $92.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.1M | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.1M | $125.8M |
| Q4 25 | $401.9M | $333.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.4M | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $534.9M | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.8M | $239.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.0M | $244.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.1M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $548.1M | $277.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.3M | $308.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $566.2M | $306.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.0M | $314.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $697.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $715.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $707.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $712.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $741.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $756.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $733.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $746.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.5M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-25.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -17.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-23.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
PAMT
| Freight Transportation Service | $123.1M | 87% |
| Fuel Surcharge | $18.2M | 13% |
