vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SITIME Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.3M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.2× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
PACK vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.7M | $113.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 56.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 1.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | 66.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 148.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.8M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.6M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.6M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $43.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.5M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.4M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.1M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.1M | $-28.7M |
| Q4 25 | 39.0% | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.6% | 53.5% |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.5% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | -106.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.6% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.3% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | -61.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.2% | -86.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $401.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.9M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $401.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $534.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.1M | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $548.1M | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.3M | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $566.2M | $692.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.0M | $696.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $878.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $942.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.5M | $25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $35.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.6M | $-181.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
