vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.4× PACS Group, Inc.). PACS Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs 4.2%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
PACS vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $59.7M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3022.5% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $981.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $934.3M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.9M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.1M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.38 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $197.0M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $353.2M | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $946.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $294.2M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.4M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.2M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $353.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $946.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $806.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $750.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $709.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $572.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.06× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.6M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.8M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.06× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.28× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.78× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.39× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PACS
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
