vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Weyerhaeuser is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.1× PACS Group, Inc.). Weyerhaeuser runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs 4.4%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs -9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -7.4%).
The Weyerhaeuser Company is an American timberland company which owns approximately 10,400,000 acres of timberlands in the U.S., and manages an additional 14,000,000 acres of timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. The company has manufactured wood products for over a century. It operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT).
PACS vs WY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $59.7M | $74.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3022.5% | -8.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $981.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $934.3M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | $74.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.9M | $173.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.1M | $114.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.38 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $197.0M | $464.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $353.2M | $5.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $946.8M | $9.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $16.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $464.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.7M | $401.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $294.2M | $592.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.5M | $560.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.7M | $684.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $877.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.4M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.2M | $871.0M |
| Q4 25 | $353.2M | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.9M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $946.8M | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.3M | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $806.8M | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $750.2M | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $709.6M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $572.1M | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $10.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $16.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $16.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $-114.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-128.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.06× | -1.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $511.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.8M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $396.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.2M | $70.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.6M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8M | $432.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.8M | $124.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $203.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $388.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $226.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $423.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.06× | -1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.91× | 2.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 4.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.28× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.78× | 2.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.39× | 8.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
