vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP (PAHC) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp (ZWS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($407.2M vs $373.9M, roughly 1.1× PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP). Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp runs the higher net margin — 10.3% vs 7.3%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.9% vs 9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH CORP's revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Phibro Animal Health Corporation is an American animal health and mineral nutrition company. Its products include antibacterials, anticoccidials, anthelmintics, as well as animal nutrition and vaccines for livestock. The company operates through three segments Mineral Nutrition, Performance Materials, and Animal Health, from which most of its revenue is derived. The company operates in the United States, Latin America, Canada, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. It is incorporated ...
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp designs, manufactures, and distributes a wide range of water management and dispensing products, including commercial plumbing fixtures, drinking fountains, water filtration systems, and flow control components. It serves commercial, residential, industrial, and public infrastructure markets primarily across North America, with a focus on delivering sustainable, water-efficient solutions for diverse end-user needs.
PAHC vs ZWS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $373.9M | $407.2M |
| Net Profit | $27.5M | $42.1M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.3% | 10.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.9% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 762.1% | 15.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $373.9M | $407.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $363.9M | $455.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.7M | $444.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $347.8M | $388.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.3M | $370.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.4M | $410.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.2M | $412.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.2M | $373.8M |
| Q4 25 | $27.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $43.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $36.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $752.0K | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $34.3M |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | 44.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.9% | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | 46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.1% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 45.5% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 14.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 9.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.67 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.51 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $74.5M | $300.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $624.2M | $496.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $332.4M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.88× | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $300.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.3M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.0M | $201.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.4M | $144.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.1M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.8M | $187.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.6M | $162.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.7M | $157.1M |
| Q4 25 | $624.2M | $496.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.0M | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.7M | $495.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $635.4M | $495.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.1M | $495.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.2M | $495.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $312.1M | $495.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $495.4M |
| Q4 25 | $332.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $311.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $285.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $270.1M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $966.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $982.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.88× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.01× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.21× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.59× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.31× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.4M | $91.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.70× | 2.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $47.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $91.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $85.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | $53.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.07× | 0.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.97× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.80× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PAHC
| Medicated Feed Additives And Others | $202.1M | 54% |
| Mineral Nutrition | $68.9M | 18% |
| Nutritional Specialties | $50.2M | 13% |
| Vaccines | $37.6M | 10% |
| Performance Products | $15.0M | 4% |
ZWS
Segment breakdown not available.
