vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (PANL) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($183.9M vs $124.5M, roughly 1.5× PagerDuty, Inc.). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs 6.5%, a 123.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (32.5% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is a global dry bulk logistics and shipping service provider. It operates a modern fleet of dry bulk vessels to transport a wide range of commodities including grains, minerals, construction materials, and energy-related raw materials, serving industrial, agricultural, and energy sector clients across North America, Europe, and Asia with tailored end-to-end bulk cargo supply chain solutions.
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
PANL vs PD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $183.9M | $124.5M |
| Net Profit | $11.9M | $161.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 129.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.9% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.9% | 2827.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $183.9M | $124.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.7M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.8M | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.2M | $118.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.1M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.5M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.7M | $111.1M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $-28.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 81.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -25.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.25 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.1M | $547.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $249.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $429.3M | $320.5M |
| Total Assets | $928.1M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.1M | $547.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.0M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $597.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.9M | $570.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.8M | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | $599.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.9M | $592.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.9M | $571.2M |
| Q4 25 | $249.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.9M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $429.3M | $320.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.3M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.4M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $420.8M | $129.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $427.8M | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.6M | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $332.0M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $928.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.1M | $891.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $916.0M | $926.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $918.0M | $927.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $936.5M | $866.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $749.2M | $916.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.9M | $924.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.3M | $925.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | 3.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | 2.85× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.1M | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.27× | 0.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.6M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PANL
| Voyage | $166.3M | 90% |
| Charter | $13.1M | 7% |
| Terminal Stevedore Revenue | $4.4M | 2% |
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
