vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Serve Robotics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($881.5K vs $707.3K, roughly 1.2× Pineapple Financial Inc.). Pineapple Financial Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2756.2% vs -3888.1%, a 1131.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs -4.8%). Pineapple Financial Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.3M vs $-46.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Pineapple Financial Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.0% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
PAPL vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $707.3K | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | $-19.5M | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2518.8% | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | -2756.2% | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3174.1% | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.21 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $707.3K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $721.7K | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $730.5K | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $746.9K | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $743.3K | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $766.1K | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $598.3K | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.4K | $468.0K |
| Q1 26 | $-19.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.4M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-557.7K | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-595.4K | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-656.9K | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-848.6K | $-9.0M |
| Q1 26 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.6% | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.6% | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.4% | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.9% | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.2% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.2% | 30.3% |
| Q1 26 | -2518.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -909.1% | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -131.3% | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -93.3% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.6% | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -90.5% | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -232.8% | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -121.7% | -1828.2% |
| Q1 26 | -2756.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -891.6% | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -250.3% | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -74.7% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.1% | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.7% | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -283.9% | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.2% | -1931.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-1.21 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.79 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.93 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.73 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.60 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.10 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.1M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $48.9M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.8M |
| Q1 26 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.7K | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $842.6K | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $739.7K | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $28.5M |
| Q1 26 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $32.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.3M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.3M | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -462.7% | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-489.7K | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-507.6K | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $397.0K | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-172.6K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-663.6K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-264.7K | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-5.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-491.7K | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-264.7K | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.7K | $-6.5M |
| Q1 26 | -462.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.2% | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | -1396.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 169.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
