vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) and Sidus Space Inc. (SIDU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pineapple Financial Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($707.3K vs $366.0K, roughly 1.9× Sidus Space Inc.). Pineapple Financial Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2756.2% vs -3115.2%, a 359.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pineapple Financial Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.8% vs -16.2%). Pineapple Financial Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.3M vs $-6.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Pineapple Financial Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.0% CAGR vs -43.8%).
Sidus Space Inc is a U.S.-headquartered space technology and services provider specializing in small satellite design, manufacturing and operation. It offers end-to-end space solutions including data analytics, on-orbit servicing and custom hardware for commercial, government and academic clients worldwide, supporting various space mission objectives.
PAPL vs SIDU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $707.3K | $366.0K |
| Net Profit | $-19.5M | $-11.4M |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | -474.9% |
| Operating Margin | -2518.8% | -3009.2% |
| Net Margin | -2756.2% | -3115.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | -16.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3174.1% | -100.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.21 | $-0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $707.3K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $721.7K | $366.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $730.5K | $559.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $746.9K | $691.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $743.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $766.1K | $436.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $598.3K | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.4K | $834.8K |
| Q1 26 | $-19.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.4M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-557.7K | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-595.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-656.9K | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-848.6K | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.6% | -474.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | -232.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.6% | -148.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.9% | -171.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.2% | -100.8% |
| Q1 26 | -2518.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -909.1% | -3009.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -131.3% | -1007.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -93.3% | -765.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -90.5% | -1165.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -232.8% | -180.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -121.7% | -466.9% |
| Q1 26 | -2756.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -891.6% | -3115.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -250.3% | -1079.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -74.7% | -814.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.7% | -1300.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -283.9% | -222.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -115.2% | -495.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-1.21 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.79 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.93 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.73 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.60 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.10 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.1M | $50.6M |
| Total Assets | $48.9M | $66.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | $50.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.7K | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $842.6K | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $739.7K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $13.1M |
| Q1 26 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | $66.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $21.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.3M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.3M | $-6.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -462.7% | -1768.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 651.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-28.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-489.7K | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-507.6K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $397.0K | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-172.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-663.6K | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-264.7K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-2.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-491.7K | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-264.7K | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.7K | $-4.0M |
| Q1 26 | -462.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | -1768.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1369.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -870.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1811.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.2% | -213.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | -477.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 651.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 256.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 199.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 543.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 58.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 220.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
