vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC (PATK) and Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Qnity Electronics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $924.2M, roughly 1.4× PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC). Qnity Electronics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 3.1%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Qnity Electronics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 9.2%). Qnity Electronics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($568.0M vs $112.7M).
Anduril Industries, Inc. is an American defense technology company specializing in the development of advanced autonomous systems.
PATK vs Q — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $924.2M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $29.1M | $211.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 21.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.1% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.7% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $924.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $975.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $846.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $919.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $933.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.1% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.44 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.80 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.59 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $26.4M | $128.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $9.1B |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.10× | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.8M | $782.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $112.7M | $568.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.2% | 44.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.50× | 3.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $246.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $112.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.2M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | 3.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PATK
| Recreational Vehicle | $276.3M | 30% |
| Distribution | $222.4M | 24% |
| Marine | $141.9M | 15% |
| Industrial | $110.8M | 12% |
| Powersports | $104.8M | 11% |
| Manufactured Housing | $67.9M | 7% |
Q
| Semiconductor Technologies | $693.0M | 54% |
| Interconnect Solutions | $583.0M | 46% |
