vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) and UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST (UHT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.5M vs $12.4M, roughly 2.0× Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.). UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs -5.5%, a 23.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18033.4% vs -0.7%).
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
PAVS vs UHT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.4M | $24.5M |
| Net Profit | $-681.0K | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | -5.5% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 18033.4% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | -7.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.4M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-681.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.2M | $6.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $374.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.6M | $152.4M |
| Total Assets | $37.3M | $564.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $374.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $368.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $158.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $172.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $179.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $190.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $564.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.3M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $573.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $580.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $584.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $586.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $596.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-159.3K | $49.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 11.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-159.3K | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PAVS
Segment breakdown not available.
UHT
| Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment | $23.1M | 94% |
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $2.3M | 9% |
