vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Paycom (PAYC) and Sylvamo Corp (SLVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Sylvamo Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($890.0M vs $544.3M, roughly 1.6× Paycom). Paycom runs the higher net margin — 20.9% vs 3.7%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Paycom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.2% vs -8.2%). Paycom produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.6M vs $38.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Paycom's revenue compounded faster (4.3% CAGR vs -0.8%).

Paycom Software, Inc., known simply as Paycom, is an online payroll and human resource software provider based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma with offices throughout the United States. It is attributed with being one of the first fully online payroll providers. Founded in 1998, it reported annual revenue of $2.052 billion for 2025, up from $1.883 billion for 2024.

Sylvamo Corp is a leading global manufacturer of sustainable paper and pulp products. Its core offerings include uncoated printing paper, packaging paper, and market pulp, serving office supplies, publishing, commercial printing, and packaging segments across North America, Europe, and Latin America.

PAYC vs SLVM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SLVM
SLVM
1.6× larger
SLVM
$890.0M
$544.3M
PAYC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PAYC
PAYC
+18.5% gap
PAYC
10.2%
-8.2%
SLVM
Higher net margin
PAYC
PAYC
17.2% more per $
PAYC
20.9%
3.7%
SLVM
More free cash flow
PAYC
PAYC
$84.6M more FCF
PAYC
$122.6M
$38.0M
SLVM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PAYC
PAYC
Annualised
PAYC
4.3%
-0.8%
SLVM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Revenue
$544.3M
$890.0M
Net Profit
$113.8M
$33.0M
Gross Margin
83.9%
Operating Margin
28.9%
8.9%
Net Margin
20.9%
3.7%
Revenue YoY
10.2%
-8.2%
Net Profit YoY
0.2%
-59.3%
EPS (diluted)
$2.06
$0.81

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$544.3M
$890.0M
Q3 25
$493.3M
$846.0M
Q2 25
$483.6M
$794.0M
Q1 25
$530.5M
$821.0M
Q4 24
$493.9M
$970.0M
Q3 24
$451.9M
$965.0M
Q2 24
$437.5M
$933.0M
Q1 24
$499.9M
$905.0M
Net Profit
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$113.8M
$33.0M
Q3 25
$110.7M
$57.0M
Q2 25
$89.5M
$15.0M
Q1 25
$139.4M
$27.0M
Q4 24
$113.6M
$81.0M
Q3 24
$73.3M
$95.0M
Q2 24
$68.0M
$83.0M
Q1 24
$247.2M
$43.0M
Gross Margin
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
83.9%
Q3 25
82.7%
Q2 25
81.9%
Q1 25
84.1%
Q4 24
83.1%
Q3 24
80.5%
Q2 24
80.8%
Q1 24
84.3%
Operating Margin
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
28.9%
8.9%
Q3 25
22.8%
11.6%
Q2 25
23.2%
3.8%
Q1 25
34.9%
5.4%
Q4 24
30.1%
11.2%
Q3 24
23.2%
15.5%
Q2 24
21.7%
13.1%
Q1 24
57.2%
8.0%
Net Margin
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
20.9%
3.7%
Q3 25
22.4%
6.7%
Q2 25
18.5%
1.9%
Q1 25
26.3%
3.3%
Q4 24
23.0%
8.4%
Q3 24
16.2%
9.8%
Q2 24
15.5%
8.9%
Q1 24
49.4%
4.8%
EPS (diluted)
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$2.06
$0.81
Q3 25
$1.96
$1.41
Q2 25
$1.58
$0.37
Q1 25
$2.48
$0.65
Q4 24
$2.04
$1.91
Q3 24
$1.31
$2.27
Q2 24
$1.20
$1.98
Q1 24
$4.37
$1.02

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$370.0M
$198.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$763.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.7B
$966.0M
Total Assets
$7.6B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.79×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$370.0M
$198.0M
Q3 25
$375.0M
$146.0M
Q2 25
$532.2M
$183.0M
Q1 25
$520.8M
$220.0M
Q4 24
$402.0M
$309.0M
Q3 24
$325.8M
$414.0M
Q2 24
$346.5M
$213.0M
Q1 24
$371.3M
$218.0M
Total Debt
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$763.0M
Q3 25
$778.0M
Q2 25
$767.0M
Q1 25
$794.0M
Q4 24
$782.0M
Q3 24
$883.0M
Q2 24
$894.0M
Q1 24
$921.0M
Stockholders' Equity
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$1.7B
$966.0M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$977.0M
Q2 25
$1.8B
$959.0M
Q1 25
$1.7B
$908.0M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$847.0M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$937.0M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$830.0M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$889.0M
Total Assets
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$7.6B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$4.0B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$4.6B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$5.9B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$3.5B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$4.3B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$4.7B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
0.79×
Q3 25
0.80×
Q2 25
0.80×
Q1 25
0.87×
Q4 24
0.92×
Q3 24
0.94×
Q2 24
1.08×
Q1 24
1.04×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$196.1M
$94.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$122.6M
$38.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
22.5%
4.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
13.5%
6.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.72×
2.85×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$408.0M
$44.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$196.1M
$94.0M
Q3 25
$177.8M
$87.0M
Q2 25
$122.5M
$64.0M
Q1 25
$182.5M
$23.0M
Q4 24
$160.4M
$164.0M
Q3 24
$92.8M
$163.0M
Q2 24
$132.1M
$115.0M
Q1 24
$148.6M
$27.0M
Free Cash Flow
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
$122.6M
$38.0M
Q3 25
$79.8M
$33.0M
Q2 25
$60.8M
$-2.0M
Q1 25
$144.8M
$-25.0M
Q4 24
$109.0M
$100.0M
Q3 24
$44.6M
$119.0M
Q2 24
$86.5M
$62.0M
Q1 24
$100.9M
$-33.0M
FCF Margin
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
22.5%
4.3%
Q3 25
16.2%
3.9%
Q2 25
12.6%
-0.3%
Q1 25
27.3%
-3.0%
Q4 24
22.1%
10.3%
Q3 24
9.9%
12.3%
Q2 24
19.8%
6.6%
Q1 24
20.2%
-3.6%
Capex Intensity
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
13.5%
6.3%
Q3 25
19.9%
6.4%
Q2 25
12.8%
8.3%
Q1 25
7.1%
5.8%
Q4 24
10.4%
6.6%
Q3 24
10.7%
4.6%
Q2 24
10.4%
5.7%
Q1 24
9.5%
6.6%
Cash Conversion
PAYC
PAYC
SLVM
SLVM
Q4 25
1.72×
2.85×
Q3 25
1.61×
1.53×
Q2 25
1.37×
4.27×
Q1 25
1.31×
0.85×
Q4 24
1.41×
2.02×
Q3 24
1.27×
1.72×
Q2 24
1.94×
1.39×
Q1 24
0.60×
0.63×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

PAYC
PAYC

Recurring$510.3M94%
Interest On Funds Held For Clients$27.2M5%
Implementation And Other$6.8M1%

SLVM
SLVM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons