vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.2× SILICOM LTD.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 6.6%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-3.3M).
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
PBYI vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.5M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.7% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $97.5M | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.3M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $216.3M | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.0M | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.1M | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $216.3M | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.3M | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.1% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
