vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.8× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs -2.2%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
PBYI vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.5M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | — | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.7% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.8M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.5% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.5% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $97.5M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.3M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $216.3M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.2M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.7M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.0M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $216.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.1M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.1% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.7M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
