vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI) and BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. (TBHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.5M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.4× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs -9.6%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-26.8M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -21.0%).
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Soho House is an international private members’ club with a focus on the media, arts and fashion industries.
PBYI vs TBHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.5M | $103.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 20.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | -1.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.7% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 51.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | $103.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | $75.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $148.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $114.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $86.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.8M | $165.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.4% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.5% | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | -26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | $-1.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $97.5M | $6.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.3M | $-44.0M |
| Total Assets | $216.3M | $229.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.2M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.3M | $61.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.0M | $34.0M |
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $-44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | $-35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.7M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.1M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.0M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $216.3M | $229.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | $221.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | $242.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.3M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.0M | $242.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.1M | $250.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | 10.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $-25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | $-26.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.1% | -25.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.7M | $-18.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $28.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | -25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | 2.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.