vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEGASYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($430.0M vs $314.2M, roughly 1.4× POTLATCHDELTIC CORP). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 7.6%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs -9.6%). PEGASYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($206.5M vs $50.1M). Over the past eight quarters, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 10.7%).
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Pegasystems Inc. (Pega) is a global software company based in Waltham, Massachusetts, in the United States, and founded in 1983. The company has been publicly traded since 1996 as PEGA (NASDAQ). Pega is a low-code platform for workflow automation and generative AI-powered decision-making for businesses.
PCH vs PEGA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $430.0M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | $32.8M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | -61.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $430.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $504.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $381.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | $384.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | $490.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | $325.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $351.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $234.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $6.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 72.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 72.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $270.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $705.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $270.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $425.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | $351.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $411.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | $371.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | $740.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | $703.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $665.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $787.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $596.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $624.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $611.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $585.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $435.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $206.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 48.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | $494.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | $40.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $206.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $202.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $38.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | 2.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | 6.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
PEGA
| Pega Cloud | $205.0M | 48% |
| Subscription license | $94.9M | 22% |
| Maintenance | $75.3M | 18% |
| Consulting | $54.8M | 13% |
