vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.2M vs $304.6M, roughly 1.0× Trip.com Group Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs 8.2%, a 19.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
PCH vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $304.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $242.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-305.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 81.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $180.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $18.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $34.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
