vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.2M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.3× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 8.2%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 2.4%). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.1M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 11.1%).
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
PCH vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.1M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-305.0K | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.1% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $180.2M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
