vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.4× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -125.2%, a 132.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $-256.6M).
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
PCLA vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
