vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($385.6M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.5× PicoCELA Inc.). Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs -125.2%, a 136.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($402.6M vs $-256.6M).
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is a specialty property and casualty insurance provider offering tailored coverage solutions including commercial auto, general liability, professional indemnity, and specialty property policies. It primarily serves small-to-medium enterprises and niche industry segments across the United States, focusing on underwriting complex, hard-to-place risks for underserved client groups.
PCLA vs SKWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $385.6M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $43.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | 14.2% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 26.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 200.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $385.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $382.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $328.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $42.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | $168.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $168.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $160.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $961.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $899.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $850.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $797.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $723.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $692.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | $408.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | $402.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | 104.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $755.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $408.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $305.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $402.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | $96.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $167.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 104.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 98.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
SKWD
Segment breakdown not available.
