vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.8× STRATASYS LTD.). STRATASYS LTD. runs the higher net margin — -40.6% vs -125.2%, a 84.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-256.6M).
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
PCLA vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $159.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-47.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-38.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 41.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -26.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -21.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -24.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.68 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $144.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $784.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $866.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $883.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $923.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-23.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | $789.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-26.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -16.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
