vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tenable Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($262.1M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.0× PicoCELA Inc.). Tenable Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -125.2%, a 125.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Tenable Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($82.6M vs $-256.6M).
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
Tenable Holdings, Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Columbia, Maryland. Its vulnerability scanner software Nessus, developed in 1998, is one of the most widely deployed vulnerability assessment solutions in the cybersecurity industry. As of December 31, 2023, the company had approximately 44,000 customers, including 65% of the Fortune 500.
PCLA vs TENB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $262.1M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | 25.0% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $262.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $260.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $252.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $247.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $239.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $235.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $221.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | $360.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $248.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $360.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $383.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $386.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | $460.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $577.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $548.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $487.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $248.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $326.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $344.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $350.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $383.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $400.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $404.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $363.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | $88.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | $82.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | 31.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 62.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $256.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $87.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | $80.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | 33.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
TENB
| Subscription revenue | $243.2M | 93% |
| Perpetual license and maintenance revenue | $10.2M | 4% |
| Other | $8.7M | 3% |
