vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and VORNADO REALTY TRUST (VNO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VORNADO REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($453.7M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.8× PicoCELA Inc.). VORNADO REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -125.2%, a 126.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
Vornado Realty Trust is a real estate investment trust formed in Maryland in 1982, with its primary office in New York City. The company invests in office buildings and street retail in Manhattan.
PCLA vs VNO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $453.7M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $4.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | 2.8% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -14.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $453.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $453.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $441.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $461.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $457.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $443.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $450.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $436.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $759.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $102.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 172.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | $840.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $6.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $15.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $840.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | $568.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $733.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $783.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $872.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $892.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $15.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 256.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $537.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 256.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 93.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
VNO
| New York Segment | $374.8M | 83% |
| Building Maintenance Service | $41.2M | 9% |
| Other | $27.7M | 6% |
| Tenant Services | $11.1M | 2% |
| Management And Leasing Fees | $2.6M | 1% |
