vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. (XPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.1M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.5× PicoCELA Inc.). EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -125.2%, a 126.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.2M vs $-256.6M).
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
Expro is an energy services provider headquartered in Houston, Texas, United States.
PCLA vs XPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $382.1M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $5.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -74.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $382.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $422.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $390.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $422.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $469.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $383.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | $196.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $79.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $206.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | $179.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $165.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $163.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $79.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $40.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | $57.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $97.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $97.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-49.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-801.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
XPRO
| NLA | $130.3M | 34% |
| ESSA | $116.3M | 30% |
| MENA | $93.0M | 24% |
| Other | $42.5M | 11% |
