vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.4× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -10.8%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 4.4%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
PCOR vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.1M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $-37.6M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.6% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.6% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $349.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.9M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.0M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.3M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.4M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-62.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.1% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.42 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $768.5M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $768.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $684.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $620.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $775.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $735.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $744.6M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.9M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.2M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.3% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $282.2M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.0M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.7M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.1M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.7M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.1M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
