vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) and XBP Global Holdings, Inc. (XBP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XBP Global Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.4M vs $124.5M, roughly 1.2× PagerDuty, Inc.). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs -200.7%, a 330.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PagerDuty, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs -34.7%). PagerDuty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.1M vs $10.5M).
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
PD vs XBP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $124.5M | $152.4M |
| Net Profit | $161.6M | $-305.8M |
| Gross Margin | 85.3% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | -191.7% |
| Net Margin | 129.7% | -200.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | -34.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2827.7% | -980.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $-2.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $124.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.4M | $152.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.9M | $233.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $161.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6M | $-305.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.9M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 84.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.7% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -191.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 129.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | -200.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.4% | -12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $-2.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $547.8M | $34.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $381.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $320.5M | $130.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $947.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $547.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.9M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $597.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $570.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $542.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $599.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $381.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $484.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $320.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.7M | $130.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.7M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $891.5M | $947.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $926.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $927.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $866.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $916.0M | $99.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $924.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $925.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.85× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $24.8M | $13.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.1M | $10.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.3% | 6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $117.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.1M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
XBP
| Related And Non Related Party | $136.5M | 90% |
| Technology | $8.2M | 5% |
| Other | $5.7M | 4% |
| Deferred Revenue As Of July312025 | $1.9M | 1% |
